![]() ![]() While the aggregate device will be useful in mixdown, the latency is higher and I won't use it during tracking.Finally figured out the sample rate dance on the USB connection and I have 4 stereo FX loops via ADAT on the Apollo and 8 stereo loops on USB via a MacOS aggregate device in Logic. Hooked up ADAT and word clock from my Apollo X8 and USB to the computer. Sweetwater upgraded the shipping to 2 day at no cost and thew in a free BNC word clock cable along with candy, of course. It's a hardware FX box that configures like a plugin, but doesn't take up CPU. You could have dedicated FX chains for each, trigger them via MIDI, really anything you can dream up you could do. but it's here, so why not, and everyone likes playing into the spaces it makes!įor a big stack of keyboards, its hard to go wrong. I never tell them where the reverb is coming from, but everyone likes it. It also sounds ridiculously good compared to what anyone expects. I have ~2ms of latency from mic to IEMs, and the Eventide works 100% in the digital realm. The reverbs used for tracking a full band all come from the Eventide. I run the monitor path through an SQ-5 digital mixer. The other thing I use it for is recording live in the studio. I picked it blind when someone posted a reverb shootout a few years ago, so it works for me. There are other "expensive" sounding reverbs. The Eventide reverbs are very configurable and I like the sound. That said, by putting a bunch of reverb duties off onto the H9K, I dropped CPU utilization by 25%. If all you want is a reverb for composing, its an expensive way to get it. And unlike UAD, it is meant to be heavily bent to suit your needs for sound design etc. It's basically an outboard processor, not unlike a UAD card, but instead of dedicated to vintage FX, it is full of creative effects. The eMote software is now quite useful and stable. This gives me 32 ch of I/O worth of access. ![]() Mine is connected via Dante to the studio network. BUT will require a lot more effort and CAN'T RECALL SOUNDS CAN RECALL SOUNDSįlock pros - Can do almost as much with an h9 pedal send and return and can do things the h9k can't. Studio grade FX that will take years to explore. H9k pros - Can do midi clock effortlessly. A germanium fuzz pedal or some sort of tube or spring pedal are things the H9k can't do. The Flock solution will allow you to get a things the H9000 can't - namely analog circuit sounds. It also has a lot more fx algorithms than both the plugin offerings and the h9 pedal. I have a lot of the Eventide plugins and the h9k seems to sound better to my ears. The h9k gives you really beautiful crystal clear digital FX. I have a Flock and a H9000r and I love both for different reasons. Flock + Pedals will get you very different results to the H9000 ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |